But as the tattooing was not done properly, the victim would be left with some scarring and skin damage, said Assistant Public Prosecutor G.K. Jayarajan.
'The accused abused his skill and know-how and collaborated with his accomplice to permanently and publicly brand the victim,' he told the court.
Despite the tattooist pleading for a lighter sentence, Judge Tan said she saw no 'substantial difference' between his and the husband's culpability. What the victim's husband had done was a 'grave wrong', but he did it because he had suspected his wife was unfaithful, the judge said.